Maduro may fuck off. But if 15 years from now, big powers cause crisis after crisis in third countries (maybe yours!) just by powering powerless buffoons (de facto nobodies) through social media ruckus because they are the legitimate whatnot, remember people warned you.
In international relations countries "recognise" states (structures having at least a partial control over a territory), not "governments". When it comes to "recognition", countries do not enter in the issue of the head of state deriving his/her power from the mandate of the masses, from a coup or from a strange woman lying in a pond distributing swords in a farcical aquatic ceremony.
The "recognition" of a State (simply an application of a principle of reality) is also independent from wanting regime change, be it with the head of that State commiting seppuku, be it by frying that state with sanctions, or if you get along with hawkish plans be it by financing terrorist contras or just by bombing the shit out of 'em. All in all, the "recognition" is not a question of morality.
Easening regime change through shortcuts based on post-truth may look cheap but it can only bring more destabilization to the world. This is not a good innovation. The order matters. It makes for a worse timeline.
Bolton is a provocateur.