Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Erling Haaland - Man City Complete Signing of Dortmund Striker


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

There was defo a cap on what we thought he was worth, wasting £100 on Greelish meant we couldn't over spend on Kane too though

But you could if you really wanted to, there would be no consideration of sell on value or wages, there wouldn't need to be a discussion about funds.

You could just press the button and do the transfer without any financial consideration. Only yourself, Newcastle and PSG can do that and it's not fair for competition.

Chelsea were borderline as it was but the money involved with the Arabs is destroying competition in sport. Its turning it into formula one, best car, best driver, best engine.

Just makes it boring and predictable.

City will sign Haaland this summer and its game over for everyone once they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 482
  • Created
  • Last Reply
23 minutes ago, Devil said:

But you could if you really wanted to, there would be no consideration of sell on value or wages, there wouldn't need to be a discussion about funds.

You could just press the button and do the transfer without any financial consideration. Only yourself, Newcastle and PSG can do that and it's not fair for competition.

Chelsea were borderline as it was but the money involved with the Arabs is destroying competition in sport. Its turning it into formula one, best car, best driver, best engine.

Just makes it boring and predictable.

City will sign Haaland this summer and its game over for everyone once they do.

United have out spent us over the last 5 years though which proves it's not just about money. you can have all the bricks in the world but if you have a cunt building the house its going to fall down 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

United have out spent us over the last 5 years though which proves it's not just about money. you can have all the bricks in the world but if you have a cunt building the house its going to fall down 

Read back on my posts, I said it's not just the playing side. 

It's not a level playing field no matter how you stick up for City. We've spent a fortune, agreed. That was to try and bridge a gap, unfortunately we've had to keep spending the replace the huge mistakes we've been making.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

United have out spent us over the last 5 years though which proves it's not just about money. you can have all the bricks in the world but if you have a cunt building the house its going to fall down 

Have they though? On transfer fees alone, then probably. On dodgy background deals for the families of players though? Houses in Dubai? Cars, jobs for extended family etc? You’re dirtier than my car and it’s hasn’t been washed in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
10 hours ago, Waylander said:

Rumour starting to circulate that Haaland is injury prone, £170m think that ship has sailed perhaps £120m.

Rumours? 

You either are or you aren't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Devil said:

But you could if you really wanted to, there would be no consideration of sell on value or wages, there wouldn't need to be a discussion about funds.

You could just press the button and do the transfer without any financial consideration. Only yourself, Newcastle and PSG can do that and it's not fair for competition.

Chelsea were borderline as it was but the money involved with the Arabs is destroying competition in sport. Its turning it into formula one, best car, best driver, best engine.

Just makes it boring and predictable.

City will sign Haaland this summer and its game over for everyone once they do.

Not necessarily they still have to get him to play with the team, we have seen with Lukaku that the system is very important.

There may be a backlash if the money outlay becomes habitual and will probably lead to calls for a stronger version of FFP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said:

Have they though? On transfer fees alone, then probably. On dodgy background deals for the families of players though? Houses in Dubai? Cars, jobs for extended family etc? You’re dirtier than my car and it’s hasn’t been washed in years.

 

DcDDGrZX0AIw4S1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
18 minutes ago, Sean Ape said:

Isn't Haaland value supposed to drop given his current ankle injury, that is actually going to affect his work rate, check out what Marco Rose had to say about this

 

In todays crazy Market he's worth 150million at least, best striker on the planet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Happy Blue said:

In todays crazy Market he's worth 150million at least, best striker on the planet 

He only plays 2/3s of a season because he's more injury prone than Harry Kane.

He won't last in this league getting kicked all over your empty stadium :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, LFCMadLad said:

He only plays 2/3s of a season because he's more injury prone than Harry Kane.

He won't last in this league getting kicked all over your empty stadium :ph34r:

Yes but we can afford better plasters at City ;) :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommy said:

He's more often injury than healthy these days. Dortmund can be more than happy if they get close to what the rumoured price is. 

60 something million, they would of got a lot more if he didn't have a release clause 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
1 minute ago, Tommy said:

He's more often injury than healthy these days. Dortmund can be more than happy if they get close to what the rumoured price is. 

On 20/03/2022 at 05:57, Waylander said:

Rumour starting to circulate that Haaland is injury prone, £170m think that ship has sailed perhaps £120m.

I've been saying for weeks that he's a crock.  I'll take the 75m in the release clause and let's move on.  He wants 30m in wages...he can fuck off somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man United fans pissing themselves over city yet have spent 80m or more on Pogba, Sancho, McGuire.  I'm sure fernandes cost a ton and Ronaldo takes home half a bar a week.

Newcastle may have money but the statement out the club suggests progressive rather than revolutionary players.   The club has capped wages at 200k.

Dortmund will not get close to 170m anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OrangeKhrush said:

Man United fans pissing themselves over city yet have spent 80m or more on Pogba, Sancho, McGuire.  I'm sure fernandes cost a ton and Ronaldo takes home half a bar a week.

Newcastle may have money but the statement out the club suggests progressive rather than revolutionary players.   The club has capped wages at 200k.

Dortmund will not get close to 170m anyway

He has a release clause of around £67m so yeah, they won't get close to £170m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LFCMadLad said:

He has a release clause of around £67m so yeah, they won't get close to £170m.

that's interesting, so why are man United fans screaming about other rich clubs?   we have only spent 40m as a record, man United have spent much higher sums of money.

in a way its also nice to see people threatened.  Spurs, Man U are probably the first clubs we start to hunt down and pass.  Liverpool and City will take a few years to catch up to, but maybe in 3 or 4 years Liverpool's squad ages and needs major overhauls.   it's all part of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OrangeKhrush said:

that's interesting, so why are man United fans screaming about other rich clubs?   we have only spent 40m as a record, man United have spent much higher sums of money.

in a way its also nice to see people threatened.  Spurs, Man U are probably the first clubs we start to hunt down and pass.  Liverpool and City will take a few years to catch up to, but maybe in 3 or 4 years Liverpool's squad ages and needs major overhauls.   it's all part of the game.

The main problem you have is you can only spend what you bring in so you are going to need to grow as a business before you can spend big, it's going to take along time mate before you can consistently challenge for the title and attract the top players, get comfy and enjoy the journey 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

The main problem you have is you can only spend what you bring in so you are going to need to grow as a business before you can spend big, it's going to take along time mate before you can consistently challenge for the title and attract the top players, get comfy and enjoy the journey 

xDxDxDxDxDxD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

The main problem you have is you can only spend what you bring in so you are going to need to grow as a business before you can spend big, it's going to take along time mate before you can consistently challenge for the title and attract the top players, get comfy and enjoy the journey 

it will take a couple seasons to compete at the top.  the money and City are big attractions couple with ambitious owners.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, OrangeKhrush said:

it will take a couple seasons to compete at the top.  the money and City are big attractions couple with ambitious owners.    

You need to get your money washed asap through sponsorship deals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...