Administrator Stan Posted June 8, 2018 Administrator Posted June 8, 2018 6 year deal. Good news for Spurs fans.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted June 8, 2018 Subscriber Posted June 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Cicero said: 200kpw rumored. Thought wages were an issue at Spurs? Not when there are sharks in the water.
Dr. Gonzo Posted June 8, 2018 Posted June 8, 2018 6 hours ago, Cicero said: 200kpw rumored. Thought wages were an issue at Spurs? If they keep making the CL, I imagine their wage bill will keep growing.
bozziovai Posted June 8, 2018 Posted June 8, 2018 6 hours ago, Mel81x said: Not when there are sharks in the water. a new shark specie. both a predator and a plankton eater -----
Danny Posted June 8, 2018 Posted June 8, 2018 Good move for Spurs, I imagine they're contracting up their better players before they sign someone who demands decent wages
Dave Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 About time I reckon, they ran the risk of losing a lot of players under the old wage structure and would have drifted away from others.
Rick Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 They should be able to afford competitive wages, there's no reason other than some old fashioned principles that they've penny pinched for so long.
SirBalon Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 It's really good work by Tottenham Hotspur to be sorting out the club's immediate competitive future even with the rebuilding of White Hart Lane. Whereas at Arsenal we were losing our top players in a similar vein of moving home to nearby Ashburton Grove. They're not committing the same errors or aren't cashing in whatever the scenario was back then at Arsenal FC. It doesn't mean that any of these much publicised individuals won't leave in the future, but it has definitely given the club a powerful working scope so as to not be bullied by Europe's elite clubs.
Dr. Gonzo Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 11 hours ago, SirBalon said: It's really good work by Tottenham Hotspur to be sorting out the club's immediate competitive future even with the rebuilding of White Hart Lane. Whereas at Arsenal we were losing our top players in a similar vein of moving home to nearby Ashburton Grove. They're not committing the same errors or aren't cashing in whatever the scenario was back then at Arsenal FC. It doesn't mean that any of these much publicised individuals won't leave in the future, but it has definitely given the club a powerful working scope so as to not be bullied by Europe's elite clubs. I think both Arsenal and us can serve as lessons to clubs who get in that weird spot where they're better than most of the league but not quite ready to win a fight for a CL spot consistently. At some point, Spurs had to be more flexible with their seemingly immovable wage budget if they want to keep progressing. Kane is their best talent since Bale, and is more of a talisman to them. This is a good sign for Spurs & I'm sure @Storts is delighted. I know I would be if I were in his shoes.
Danny Posted June 9, 2018 Posted June 9, 2018 14 hours ago, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: They should be able to afford competitive wages, there's no reason other than some old fashioned principles that they've penny pinched for so long. Didn't know you were an accountant
Subscriber Dan+ Posted June 10, 2018 Subscriber Posted June 10, 2018 I can't see their other players being annoyed at the breaking of the wage structure when he's clearly their best player.
The Artful Dodger Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 Arsenal pay Ozil 350k a week, what the fuck.
SirBalon Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 11 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: Arsenal pay Ozil 350k a week, what the fuck. World class elite quality costs money these days and even more for game changing players that can take a team on their shoulders and turn a seemingly negative outcome into a positive one.
Administrator Stan Posted June 10, 2018 Author Administrator Posted June 10, 2018 7 minutes ago, SirBalon said: World class elite quality costs money these days and even more for game changing players that can take a team on their shoulders and turn a seemingly negative outcome into a positive one. Ozil does not deserve to be on that much though.
SirBalon Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 Just now, Stan said: Ozil does not deserve to be on that much though. Why not? He used to be a Real Madrid player! He's world class and would walk into any team which is why earning the same as the five biggest names in the sport is justifiable.
Administrator Stan Posted June 10, 2018 Author Administrator Posted June 10, 2018 Just now, SirBalon said: Why not? He used to be a Real Madrid player! He's world class and would walk into any team which is why earning the same as the five biggest names in the sport is justifiable. I think you've overestimating his quality. Not denying he deserves to be paid a lot or isn't a good player, but to be earning the same as Messi, Ronaldo (and who else?) - really?
SirBalon Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 12 minutes ago, Stan said: I think you've overestimating his quality. Not denying he deserves to be paid a lot or isn't a good player, but to be earning the same as Messi, Ronaldo (and who else?) - really? He's earning in the same region (from the season just ended figures) as: Lionel Messi Cristiano Ronaldo Andrés Iniesta Neymar Antoine Griezmann I would say he's in there... Somewhere in between those names as a game changing individual and deserves his wages.
The Artful Dodger Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 40 minutes ago, SirBalon said: I assume you're being sarcastic, you loathe Ozil don't you?
SirBalon Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 13 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: I assume you're being sarcastic, you loathe Ozil don't you? I don't loathe Özil at all. But indeed I'm being sarcastic and putting forward all the elements required from a player that would substantiate earning that amount of money which puts him in an individualistic league of other top earners in the sport and from there we are justified in making comparisons. Of course, those who would be pro-Özil could argue that he's been in a team that's been underperforming for god knows how long but then again in the same vein we could argue against that in the sense of asking HIM whether or not he's comfortable? That word being thrown at him (comfortable) I would say is the apt one. It's not his fault though, but those that had the power at the time to formulate his current contract. Nobody came in with any offers during the final year of his contract. Nobody with anything substantial that would've turned his head by comparison on what he was already on, what he knew he could be offered and what could make the deciding factor an easier one to accept for Arsenal. Also throw into the ring the fact that we have been selling our "big" names for a number of years and the backlash the club could accumulate on top of everything else if something wasn't made evident. Remember there are a lot of idiotic fans at every club.
Subscriber Dan+ Posted June 11, 2018 Subscriber Posted June 11, 2018 Ozil's worth about half of what he's on.
SirBalon Posted June 11, 2018 Posted June 11, 2018 6 hours ago, Dan said: Ozil's worth about half of what he's on. You're being soooo kind! Even half of what he's on would be more than enough to demand expectation on a very consistent level don't you think?
6666 Posted June 12, 2018 Posted June 12, 2018 Kane should've done a Bale and forced a move to Real Madrid. Tottenham fans would've still loved him and he'd actually have a chance of winning something. Unlike Bale I think he would've actually suited the way Real Madrid want to play as well. With him staying though it'll be interesting to see if Tottenham are finally capable of living up to the hype around them and Pochettino. The golden period for Tottenham has resulted in the same thing as a normal period for Tottenham. Nothing.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.