Dave Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 36 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: Anything Allardyce dislikes is by approximation a good thing. Well I'm four his thinking. Ill get my coat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 Refs have been bottling diving decisions for a while now so this should help them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 R.I.P whatever is left of Ashley Young's career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Dan+ Posted May 18, 2017 Subscriber Share Posted May 18, 2017 Pleasantly surprised. Will be tough to implement but it can be worked upon in time. A step in the right direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirBalon Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I'm happy with this result although I wish it were more games to be honest. Players may be liable to do that if it's in a big game. Hopefully this becomes uniform throughout all the leagues everywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMadLad Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I've read that retrospective action will only happen if a penalty is given as a result of simulation or a player is sent off. Its a load of shite. Basically what they're saying is 'you can cheat anywhere on the pitch but not in the penalty area'. If you are going to do it, do it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Large Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 17 hours ago, Stan said: Allardyce says it's 'utter rubbish' and suggests sinbins instead to prevent people being punished when they were alleged to dive but didn't. Just the fact that Allardyce reckons it's a bad idea would make me consider it be a good one if I didn't already. I like retrospective action for divers. I would have staggered the punishment though. So 1 game ban for first offence, 2 games for second, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Large Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 5 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Agreed with you about Allardyce, he comes across as a right clown whenever I see him. What was the main reason for your dislike towards him at West Ham? His negative football or just the man himself? Both. I hated his football, and as a person he is just so up himself it's embarrasing. A proper chocolate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Liquidator Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 This will be a nightmare because they are asking 3 people to come to the exact same decision. You only have to think back to the many examples during the season to understand there is always someone who will go against the grain. Anyway, this is just a buffer before its done on the day with video playback, which is where they should have reached yesterday. Francis (1pen) Lee was the best diver I ever saw..... let him police it.... he knows more about the subject than almost every constantly wet Manchester United player of the last 20 seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Allardyce seemed to be getting his knickers in a twist over this. Must be pissed that Zaha and Townsend will be out suspended for 2 thirds of next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6666 Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Let's see if Richarlison can be the first to get a ban from this. Doesn't play for Tottenham or Liverpool so he may not get away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted November 21, 2017 Administrator Share Posted November 21, 2017 Niasse charged with simulation against Palace at the weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK85 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Probably time a rule is made to make dives spotted by the referee in a match a red card offence because the punishment for this, whilst I agree with a few games for a dive, is more severe than real time. If a referee misses a player stamping on someone else he gets three games retrospectively, the same as he would for if it was seen at the time. Why is a dive only a yellow real time but a ban afterwards? They can try and tart it up by saying he "deceived" the referee but he had a great view and thought it was a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 20 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Absolute joke. It's fine for Dele Alli to do it week in, week out but Oumar can't? The FA make themselves look a bigger and bigger joke with each passing week. two wrongs don't make a right. It was a clear dive and he deserves to be punished for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Is this another Everton first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK85 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 6 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Is this another Everton first? Kenneth already on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 What's that got to do with a retrospective ban for diving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 43 minutes ago, HK85 said: Probably time a rule is made to make dives spotted by the referee in a match a red card offence because the punishment for this, whilst I agree with a few games for a dive, is more severe than real time. I'd agueing losing two points in our predicament is more damaging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK85 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 18 minutes ago, LFCMike said: What's that got to do with a retrospective ban for diving? Absolutely nothing. Never a bad time to have a dig at The King. 10 minutes ago, The Palace Fan said: I'd agueing losing two points in our predicament is more damaging. Not our fault matey, Speroni should have saved it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 7 minutes ago, HK85 said: Absolutely nothing. Never a bad time to have a dig at The King. Not our fault matey, Speroni should have saved it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6666 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Not sure how Richarlison got away with it against us or how Dele Alli and Vardy always get away with it yet here Niasse got charged. Guess it's just down to the combination of the people on the panel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted November 21, 2017 Administrator Share Posted November 21, 2017 14 minutes ago, 6666 said: Not sure how Richarlison got away with it against us or how Dele Alli and Vardy always get away with it yet here Niasse got charged. Guess it's just down to the combination of the people on the panel. lol since the rule came in, name me ONE occasion Vardy has 'got away with it'. Also apparently there's 2 ex-Evertonians on the panel so why would that mean anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 14 minutes ago, 6666 said: Not sure how Richarlison got away with it against us Great. Now I've got the song from frozen "let it go" stuck in my head. Cheers @Lucas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HK85 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, Stan said: Also apparently there's 2 ex-Evertonians on the panel so why would that mean anything? Other than Rachel Brown-Finnis who's the other one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 The panel is made of three people with no affiliation to either club and they cannot consult each other. One has to be a former referee who is naturally going to be hesitant to go against the referee. Now whether Niasse is unfortunate that everybody recognised Anthony Taylor is out of his depth as a Premiership referee is neither here nor there. The fact is he dived, he cheated, he's aware of the rules, and deserves to be punished accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.