Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Liverpool 2-0 Man Utd - Sunday 19th January, 2020


football forums

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, RandoEFC said:

Rightly or wrongly, any contact on the keeper like that gets called as a foul and has been for about 10 years now. I don't know why anyone's surprised. For what it's worth I think that's a foul. You can't go wiping out the goalkeeper in midair.

This is the correct answer. The six yard box is there to protect the goalkeeper to a certain extend. And he would have easily gotten the ball if van Dijk didn't jump into him. 

Sign up to remove this ad.
  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tommy said:

This is the correct answer. The six yard box is there to protect the goalkeeper

Since when? The goalkeeper gets challenged in the 6 yard box by multiple players on every corner. VVD did nothing wrong.

Posted
4 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said:

It’s been good for my VAR bingo though. I just need ‘wet wipes’ and ‘snowflake’ for a full house.

You're not a wet wipe Phil. You are just one of a very small amount of people in a ground full of people chanting "fuck VAR", waving your little pro VAR flag alongside Stan. 

Posted
Just now, LFCMadLad said:

You're not a wet wipe Phil. You are just one of a very small amount of people in a ground full of people chanting "fuck VAR", waving your little pro VAR flag alongside Stan. 

Calm down you wet wipe :ph34r:

Posted

Regarding the disallowed goal. I thought it would be given as a foul initially but looking at the replay, I don't think it is. Can see why it's given though. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, RandoEFC said:

Rightly or wrongly, any contact on the keeper like that gets called as a foul and has been for about 10 years now. I don't know why anyone's surprised. For what it's worth I think that's a foul. You can't go wiping out the goalkeeper in midair.

Apart from Everton at Old Trafford :ph34r:

Posted
Just now, LFCMike said:

Apart from Everton at Old Trafford :ph34r:

Exactly this. 
 

Van Dijk jumps, doesn’t touch DeGea with his arms. He obviously collides but I guess the rule is you’re not allowed to challenge for the ball against the (weak as piss cunt) goalkeeper. 
 

Also, Patrice is either a master WUM or a deluded twat. I’ll go with the latter. 

  • Subscriber
Posted
Just now, LFCMike said:

Apart from Everton at Old Trafford :ph34r:

We were lucky to get that one I think but De Gea made it easier for the officials to rule against him on that occasion because he already turned his back and waved a single fist at the cross because he was too much of a pussy to take the hit and win a foul from our attackers.

They've just shown more replays at half time, its softer than I initially thought but Van Dijk still makes a decent impact on De Gea's chest/shoulder area while De Gea is in midair and has no opportunity to hold his ground. The way the game is now that's always going to be a foul.

Posted
Just now, Rick said:

Exactly this. 
 

Van Dijk jumps, doesn’t touch DeGea with his arms. He obviously collides but I guess the rule is you’re not allowed to challenge for the ball against the (weak as piss cunt) goalkeeper. 
 

Also, Patrice is either a master WUM or a deluded twat. I’ll go with the latter. 

Evra basically saying that it was the correct decision because VVD 'touched' DDG... as if that isnt allowed xD

If that's the case then every single goal scored directly from a corner should be chalked off.

The games gone mad it really has.

Posted

I don't agree with it, but I knew it was going to be disallowed. That's pretty much the established precedent these days even though De Gea's at fault for not being strong enough.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...