Honey Honey 3,593 Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 awful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy 10,054 Posted May 9, 2017 Share Posted May 9, 2017 Guess he used all his skill points on looks and football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil-Dick Willie 2,837 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 I had only seen the trailer, and thought the film looked awful. I have seen all I need to now. What shite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 4,202 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Fuck me, Hollywood is raping Arthur. You know, I'd like to see this mythology shown a little dignity. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil-Dick Willie 2,837 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 First it was Centurion Clive Owen and Keira Knightleys CGI boobs. Now the legend of Arthur is a 21st century haircut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spike 4,202 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 2 minutes ago, Tanksie said: First it was Centurion Clive Owen and Keira Knightleys CGI boobs. Now the legend of Arthur is a 21st century haircut. It isn't just the ahistorical haircuts that are giving me an ulcer. Look at that beautifully woven white jacket he is wearing, oh and those leather pants. Fucks sake, give the bloke a tunic and a robe and poxy leather footstrappings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil-Dick Willie 2,837 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 (edited) His immaculately tailored pristine white jacket is unbuttoned to show what a renegade he is. He looks more like he is at a creed concert than early ages middle England. Becks is wearing 'armor' that looks more like it's from the future than the past. How fucking shite is Hollywood now that Monty fucking python can get it more accurate. Edited May 10, 2017 by Tanksie 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey 3,593 Posted May 10, 2017 Author Share Posted May 10, 2017 4 hours ago, Spike said: Fuck me, Hollywood is raping Arthur. You know, I'd like to see this mythology shown a little dignity. It's a true story 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadLinesman 5,475 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 That. Looks. Horrendous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 1,922 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 I liked Clive Owen's version I'll be honest, great to watch when playing Rome: Total War haha. This does look horrific though, I feel like King Arthur needs a good film...LOTR/GoT style Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IgnisExcubitor 676 Posted May 10, 2017 Share Posted May 10, 2017 Wow, that was cringe inducing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toinho 1,987 Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 Still better than Asian drama acting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry 1,376 Posted May 13, 2017 Share Posted May 13, 2017 Hopefully Netflix start doing movies... thats the only hope i can see of hollywood getting out of its current funk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil-Dick Willie 2,837 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Netflix do Adam Sandler movies. You will need to look elsewhere for good films. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry 1,376 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 Its not the quality of film that's the problem. The problem is the model of cinema takings and a films success being judged based on box office receipts in the opening weekend. That means huge marketing is required to get the word out, hugely increasing costs. And resulting in a very risk averse approach that hugely limits the range and quality of films being made. I think an on demand model that enables word of a film to get out over time with word of mouth playing a larger role will give more original concepts a chance of getting made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mel81x 3,123 Posted May 14, 2017 Share Posted May 14, 2017 15 hours ago, Harry said: Its not the quality of film that's the problem. The problem is the model of cinema takings and a films success being judged based on box office receipts in the opening weekend. That means huge marketing is required to get the word out, hugely increasing costs. And resulting in a very risk averse approach that hugely limits the range and quality of films being made. I think an on demand model that enables word of a film to get out over time with word of mouth playing a larger role will give more original concepts a chance of getting made. Didn't production spinoffs like Fox Searchlight take care of that kind of problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panflute 547 Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 What's next? Alex Ferguson as Merlin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.