Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Transfer Rumours 2017


Recommended Posts

  • Subscriber
14 minutes ago, HK85 said:

I'd definitely have AOC here over Mirallas. 

We want Riedewald but apparently so do Palace who may be further on in talks with him. 

I'd rather you did too. I'm fed up of Mirallas scoring past us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
22 hours ago, Storts said:

Probably bollocks but would definitely take it. 

Do you think he would work with Kane? 

21 hours ago, 6666 said:

Still not sure why Man City are looking to sell Iheanacho. Looks a quality young player that regularly plays well and scores goals.

We will only sell him with a buy back clause so it's basically a fancy loan 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to rumours in Madrid, Chelsea want Morata (we already knew this part although Aubameyang is also connected to Chelsea in the last two days) and....  Yes, wait for it!  DANILO... Yep, DANILO.

I'm expecting this is pure and utter speculation because he is the butt of most jokes in Spain along with Douglas who went to Barça.  The only difference is that Danilo was bought for a fortune as the player to replace Carvajal (Real's best player last season) who didn't have a big enough name for Florentino Pérez.

There are also rumours César Azpilicueta could be going to Barcelona which is the only way I can see this Danilo rumour as having any reality to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SirBalon said:

According to rumours in Madrid, Chelsea want Morata (we already knew this part although Aubameyang is also connected to Chelsea in the last two days) and....  Yes, wait for it!  DANILO... Yep, DANILO.

I'm expecting this is pure and utter speculation because he is the butt of most jokes in Spain along with Douglas who went to Barça.  The only difference is that Danilo was bought for a fortune as the player to replace Carvajal (Real's best player last season) who didn't have a big enough name for Florentino Pérez.

There are also rumours César Azpilicueta could be going to Barcelona which is the only way I can see this Danilo rumour as having any reality to it.

Think even if Danilo makes it, he will make the bench. He won't push out Moses, and the Azpilicueta to Barca rumours are giving me suicidal intentions.

I would be fucking devastated 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cicero said:

Conte made Moses into a solid player, why not Danilo?

Moses was already a solid player, he just found his best position. Danilo would be a sub imo for Moses, then again Moses would have to step it up. As he could easily be benched unlike last season. I am all up for competition in the team, that means you need to be at your best every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, HK85 said:

I'd definitely have AOC here over Mirallas. 

We want Riedewald but apparently so do Palace who may be further on in talks with him. 

The Guardian are reporting that we have beaten you to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was pinned
  • Subscriber
5 hours ago, LFCMadLad said:

We are apparently lookin to bring in Atletico Madrids Angel Correa. 

Dont know shit about him to be fair. 

I think he's probably even more of what you've already got.

As for Sigurdsson, I like him a lot but fifty million is absolutely laughable. If that is the best you're getting for fifty million then huge questions need asking of the scouting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
3 minutes ago, Dan said:

I think he's probably even more of what you've already got.

As for Sigurdsson, I like him a lot but fifty million is absolutely laughable. If that is the best you're getting for fifty million then huge questions need asking of the scouting.

Sigurdsson and Mahrez both have 3 years (?) left on their contracts. 

If Sigurdsson can go for £50m, surely we can hold out AT LEAST the same amount for Mahrez?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
Just now, Stan said:

Sigurdsson and Mahrez both have 3 years (?) left on their contracts. 

If Sigurdsson can go for £50m, surely we can hold out AT LEAST the same amount for Mahrez?!

The two keep getting compared and it's quite interesting. Sigurdsson has been more consistent, but Mahrez has had a year better than Sigurdsson is ever likely to have. I think Sigurdsson is more likely to give you a 7/10 season, but Mahrez is more likely to give you a 9/10 one.

Still convinced in the right side Mahrez flourishes. He's got so much natural ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, Dan said:

The two keep getting compared and it's quite interesting. Sigurdsson has been more consistent, but Mahrez has had a year better than Sigurdsson is ever likely to have. I think Sigurdsson is more likely to give you a 7/10 season, but Mahrez is more likely to give you a 9/10 one.

Still convinced in the right side Mahrez flourishes. He's got so much natural ability.

plus you have the option of Mahrez playing centrally as well as on the right wing.

Sigurdsson would be so ineffective on the wing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
Just now, Stan said:

plus you have the option of Mahrez playing centrally as well as on the right wing.

Sigurdsson would be so ineffective on the wing. 

To be honest I've never been that impressed by Mahrez centrally. He had a good game there once (Southampton at home rings a bell) but by and large he wasn't what I thought he'd be. He's not had too many though.

I think he needs a change of scenery. It's in everyone's best interests for him to go, yet something tells me we won't budge and he won't be off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...