Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Liverpool 2-1 Tottenham - Wednesday 16th December, 2020


football forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, RandoEFC said:

Looked off before they drew the lines and then they decided that quickly? All a bit suss to me.

 

2 minutes ago, LFCMike said:

They made that decision very quickly didn't they

 

1 minute ago, Rick said:

Yeah, I think he was fucking offside. Decided so quick with one line drawn and done. 

If the line's in the right place and there's nothing to suggest it wasn't, then speed of these decisions being quicker is good for the game. No-one likes the 2-3 minute delays while they pore over inches, or less.

I'd argue it's an improvement on some other decisions seen (that Sheff Utd one against Spurs last season comes to mind where it took ages).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
Just now, Stan said:

 

 

If the line's in the right place and there's nothing to suggest it wasn't, then speed of these decisions being quicker is good for the game. No-one likes the 2-3 minute delays while they pore over inches, or less.

I'd argue it's an improvement on some other decisions seen (that Sheff Utd one against Spurs last season comes to mind where it took ages).

I agree with that and welcome it if the new normal is them getting it done within 30 seconds but it was just a bit weird how he looked offside to the naked eye and there was no zooming in or anything or showing us where the lines are drawn. I know they don't have to show us but usually they do so it was just a bit odd. Not saying it's actually corrupt or anything, just unusual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stan said:

 

 

If the line's in the right place and there's nothing to suggest it wasn't, then speed of these decisions being quicker is good for the game. No-one likes the 2-3 minute delays while they pore over inches, or less.

I'd argue it's an improvement on some other decisions seen (that Sheff Utd one against Spurs last season comes to mind where it took ages).

Honestly, I don't mind that given as a goal. Said a couple of times earlier this season that those tight ones should be given as a goal. When you see some of the decisions this season though and the length they've gone to rule goals out it's annoying. Consistency issue again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said:

They deserve a fete. Glorious.

I was going to say they couldn't have a Fete under the tier rules but it's different for Liverpool... maybe they could have a big one and perhaps a raffle and some rides or something to help raise funds for a dip in the January transfer window.. They could do a 'Wear a Salah shirt and roll around in the penalty box for 2 minutes' that should raise some extra cash.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LFCMike said:

Honestly, I don't mind that given as a goal. Said a couple of times earlier this season that those tight ones should be given as a goal. When you see some of the decisions this season though and the length they've gone to rule goals out it's annoying. Consistency issue again

Congratulations on a very well taken and unbiased point. I’d be fuming if it was against us as such because of the detail they go into over other decisions and offsides. We had the conversation a while ago though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RandoEFC said:

I agree with that and welcome it if the new normal is them getting it done within 30 seconds but it was just a bit weird how he looked offside to the naked eye and there was no zooming in or anything or showing us where the lines are drawn. I know they don't have to show us but usually they do so it was just a bit odd. Not saying it's actually corrupt or anything, just unusual.

To be fair, the furthest forward part of each player was their foot. I do think it's a bit weird they didn't zoom in, but no need for the lines in this case. Don't think this is any sort of shift to a new way of doing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, a big reason why I find conservative football unsustainable for top clubs is perfectly demonstrated by Spurs performance tonight. Bergwijn is essentially a wing back and Son is playing as a DM for the majority of the game. 

Is it successful? Of course, especially when the players buy into the "us vs them" mentality Mourinho implements. It's whether or not the players want to make a career out of it during their prime years. So its no surprise Mourinho has a track record of his sides downing tools 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Lloris Spurs best player that half.

Weird game. Liverpool dominant pretty much 95% of the game. Score a jammy goal. Spurs have one attack with Son given freedom of Anfield and he scores it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said:

Congratulations on a very well taken and unbiased point. I’d be fuming if it was against us as such because of the detail they go into over other decisions and offsides. We had the conversation a while ago though. 

The inconsistency is exactly why I'm so fucking pissed off about this.

Oh Bobby's armpit or Salah's ball bag are a milimetre offside... goal disallowed. Son's basically as questionable as it gets with an offside... with his foot, not his armpit/nipples/anything weird like that like they've looked at before. And they give it.

Basically the only consistency you can expect out of our refs is that they're inconsistent at best and incompetent at worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to Liverpool 1-1 Tottenham - Wednesday 16th December, 2020

Amazon is terrible. Coverage is behind. Didn’t even see our one attack of the half. Awful.

Terrible performance but kinda funny to be level. I hate it though. This football isn’t for me. Liverpools goal ridiculously lucky too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

The inconsistency is exactly why I'm so fucking pissed off about this.

Oh Bobby's armpit or Salah's ball bag are a milimetre offside... goal disallowed. Son's basically as questionable as it gets with an offside... with his foot, not his armpit/nipples/anything weird like that like they've looked at before. And they give it.

Basically the only consistency you can expect out of our refs is that they're inconsistent at best and incompetent at worse.

He's level though?

They just showed the lines again and they show he is level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Burning Gold said:

Another one on the goal: Amazon's presentation has been really good, but there they fell into the trap of showing us some bullshit replay or a close up of the managers when the ball was in play. Hate that shit

I think that's not just Amazon - but the global feed for the league. So not really their fault tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Storts said:

Amazon is terrible. Coverage is behind. Didn’t even see our one attack of the half. Awful.

Terrible performance but kinda funny to be level. I hate it though. This football isn’t for me. Liverpools goal ridiculously lucky too

Your goal, it just appeared with Son 1 on 1. It's been pretty poor all night.

Don't know why there are people moaning about offside, it wasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

The inconsistency is exactly why I'm so fucking pissed off about this.

Oh Bobby's armpit or Salah's ball bag are a milimetre offside... goal disallowed. Son's basically as questionable as it gets with an offside... with his foot, not his armpit/nipples/anything weird like that like they've looked at before. And they give it.

Gotta be a dodgy fucking run if your baw bag is offside xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stan said:

He's level though?

They just showed the lines again and they show he is level. 

Where I'm watching it they showed 2 angles with lines - one where he looks level and one where he doesn't and the commentary team basically said the equivalent of "lol wtf."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...