Storts Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, FOYM said: To be clear, I'm rattled by the pens, not your shit fishing I'm just pointing out what most people think. Superb
Smiley Culture Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Storts said: @Smiley Culture Yes, flower? 2 minutes ago, Storts said: Just stating facts, Gallagher said both were pens. Enough rattled people out there to suggest otherwise. You’ve not rattled anyone though, whoever the ref at Anfield was has done that. I’d be interested to see your reaction if it were the other way round.
Storts Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 Just now, Smiley Culture said: Yes, flower? You’ve not rattled anyone though, whoever the ref at Anfield was has done that. I’d be interested to see your reaction if it were the other way round. If you say so. Id be seething of course! Doesn’t mean I’d be right - just natural instinct as a football fan
Inverted Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 I've looked up the rule that apparently means Kane was onside. A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage. Id say the officials are stretching the meaning of "deliberately" playing the ball. Sticking your leg out to try and block a pass and fluffing it is hardly deliberate. If you ask who Kane "received" the ball from, I'd say he receives it more from his teammate than he does from Lovren. If Lovrens clearance attempt had rolled back to Karius I'm fairly sure he could have gathered it without it being a passback. I think we've seen a very formalistic interpretation of the rule and Gallagher is choosing not to criticise its potential unreasonableness. But I think to almost every fan this reading of the rule is highly unintuitive.
Rick Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 But you wouldn't. Because neither were a pen. I don't care if some fat prick ex ref sticks by his colleague and defends the decision. Both decisions were a joke. The media will wank Kane off now he has the 100 goals.
LFCMadLad Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Good to see that both teams on Merseyside are utter wank. We’ve lost 2 games in 21. Everton are an abortion
LFCMike Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 What's done is done. Draw was a fair result and was important for us to not lose that today. Spurs probably drop points next week anyway, which will give us an opportunity to open up the gap again
LFCMike Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Don't care about stats, Liverpool fucking up is about the only thing that is interesting at the moment. And yes, we are an abortion. Absolutely shite. I hate the cunts nearly as much as you at the moment. You're really clutching at straws if a draw to Spurs is us fucking up
Marc Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 First one was a pen second was a dive. It’s fucking obvious, how can anyone not see the second is a dive? Everyone just saying it’s a pen cause Neville said so.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted February 4, 2018 Subscriber Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Even Jurgen Klopp loves Harry Kane. I wish someone would find the clip of Klopp showing discontent at the second penalty decision. Its like watching a child who doesn't want to eat whats on their plate. With all the ruckus going on it really made me laugh.
LFCMadLad Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Don't care about stats, Liverpool fucking up is about the only thing that is interesting at the moment. And yes, we are an abortion. Absolutely shite. I hate the cunts nearly as much as you at the moment. Fucking up? We are right in the middle of battle with Chelsea, United, Arsenal & Spurs. You lot are trying your best to finish above West Brom Weve only lost 3 league games all season, bettered only by City. You do make me laugh 😂
Storts Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 Wont see a more straight forward penalty honestly, football fans will moan about anything
LFCMike Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, Cannabis said: How is conceding in the 96th minute anything other than fucking up ? Are you trying to suggest that after being 2-1 up on 95 minutes you'd have quite happily taken the draw? Absolute rubbish if so. Would have taken a draw after the way the second half played out. Of course would have been nice to get the three points but a dodgy decision has cost us that
Storts Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 4 minutes ago, Marc said: First one was a pen second was a dive. It’s fucking obvious, how can anyone not see the second is a dive? Everyone just saying it’s a pen cause Neville said so. Just look at the angle i just posted, he literally kicks him in the back of the leg, in two places. Absolutely not a dive
LFCMadLad Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Storts said: Just look at the angle i just posted, he literally kicks him in the back of the leg, in two places. Absolutely not a dive
LFCMike Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, Storts said: Wont see a more straight forward penalty honestly, football fans will moan about anything Looks like it from that angle to be fair. Horrendous reaction though. Embarrassing
Subscriber Dan+ Posted February 4, 2018 Subscriber Posted February 4, 2018 I'm not sold on what Dermot Gallagher's saying here. To summarise, he's saying that now if there's a touch on a through ball, then it's irrelevant if the striker (Kane in this case) is offside. Since when has that been the case? That's a bullshit rule, and completely contradicts the rule of influencing play. Surely the defender touching the through ball can be because of the player in the offside position anyway, meaning he is therefore influencing play, and is therefore offside. That's our 4th goal at Peterborough last week. Nearly everyone's calling that as offside, and I agree it is, but going by what Gallagher says there, it actually isn't?
Administrator Stan Posted February 4, 2018 Author Administrator Posted February 4, 2018 throwback to when Wanyama scored an absolute belter but the game will be remembered because of this dude....
LFCMadLad Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 It wasn’t just the penalty decisions that went Spurs way. They were getting everything.
Subscriber Dan+ Posted February 4, 2018 Subscriber Posted February 4, 2018 Take what I said back on the second. That's a penalty despite the reaction.
Administrator Stan Posted February 4, 2018 Author Administrator Posted February 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, LFCMike said: twitter.com/Lloydy_lfc_2018/status/960220836635475969 1 minute ago, Storts said: What a linesman - get that man to Russia like a player celebrating a goal. nothing wrong with it.
carefreeluke Posted February 4, 2018 Posted February 4, 2018 Who do you lot hate most out of the London teams out of interest?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.