Asura 274 Posted February 6, 2018 Quick Maths... 69 - 56 = 13. So City lead United by 13 points as per the table. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cicero 2,329 Posted February 6, 2018 1 minute ago, Asura said: Quick Maths... 69 - 56 = 13. So City lead United by 13 points as per the table. 3 wingbacks. 13 point lead. So each wingback City got cost United around 4 points. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Asura 274 Posted February 6, 2018 4 minutes ago, Cicero said: 3 wingbacks. 13 point lead. So each wingback City got cost United around 4 points. Not to mention United's inability to score against some lower teams due to City's excessive spending on Benjamin Mendy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Perseus 11 Posted February 7, 2018 19/20 Spot the error in the table? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Palace Fan 1,465 Posted February 7, 2018 2 hours ago, Perseus said: 19/20 Spot the error in the table? I know it's hard to believe but Brighton are actually above Palace at the moment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marc 567 Posted February 7, 2018 Really good topic. Finger on the pulse stuff 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rab 480 Posted February 7, 2018 48 minutes ago, Marc said: Really good topic. Finger on the pulse stuff I wonder how you'd be if Norwich were in the original post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Happy Blue 501 Posted February 7, 2018 12 hours ago, Cicero said: 3 wingbacks. 13 point lead. So each wingback City got cost United around 4 points. Mendy has been injured all season so 2 wing back cost united 6.5pts ...Mendy will be back soon = 19pt lead? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RandoEFC 1,922 Posted February 9, 2018 Premier League is an absolute state, we are actually in the top half. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,269 Posted February 9, 2018 5 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: Premier League is an absolute state, we are actually in the top half. You say that like 10th has the same value it once did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RandoEFC 1,922 Posted February 9, 2018 1 minute ago, Kitchen Sales said: You say that like 10th has the same value it once did This Everton side finishing 10th would remove any remaining scrap of that value from existence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,269 Posted February 9, 2018 15 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: This Everton side finishing 10th would remove any remaining scrap of that value from existence. Same can be said about Burnley finishing 7th and qualifying for Europe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RandoEFC 1,922 Posted February 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, Kitchen Sales said: Same can be said about Burnley finishing 7th and qualifying for Europe Should probably just split the league into two sections. Have a 14 team league to fight it out for the spare European slot while the top 6 have at it. Would also stop bitches complaining about fixture congestion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dan 849 Posted February 10, 2018 Everton being in the top half is ridiculous. It's a bad, bad league this year, although there's so little between a lot of the sides it'll be fascinating to see who drops. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,269 Posted February 10, 2018 It might change a bit towards the end when bottom sides dig in for more points, but at the moment 9 teams wont get 40 points Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Happy Blue 501 Posted February 27, 2018 On 09/02/2018 at 23:48, Kitchen Sales said: Same can be said about Burnley finishing 7th and qualifying for Europe Burnley are a good team Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,269 Posted February 27, 2018 14 hours ago, Happy Blue said: Burnley are a good team With no quality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
