Storts Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 8 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Should have to play at Wembley until the end of the season now Why?
The Artful Dodger Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 It's not really impacted them in a negative way in terms of performance, so not much of a punishment, just for the fans. The arseing around is annoying, couldn't they just have come out and said, right we've been massively too ambitious with the timescale, give us another season?
LFCMike Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, Storts said: Why? Why should some teams have had to play you at Wembley and others at the new ground? Depending on which way you look at it some of your opponents can make a case for being at a disadvantage as a result
Storts Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 26 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: It's not really impacted them in a negative way in terms of performance, so not much of a punishment, just for the fans. The arseing around is annoying, couldn't they just have come out and said, right we've been massively too ambitious with the timescale, give us another season? Correct - exactly what they should have done from the start. Been awful for the fans, and club are suffering as a result, even if the players are still doing the business, crowds and atmosphere are appalling as supporters staying away in huge numbers. They handled the PR so badly. This time around they've at least tried, with CAT C prices for the games, refunds in bulk etc. but too little too late for some. Think attendances over Feb are going to be horrific.
Storts Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 25 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Why should some teams have had to play you at Wembley and others at the new ground? Depending on which way you look at it some of your opponents can make a case for being at a disadvantage as a result Couldn't have said this at any time this season though? Not sure it really impacts anyone else tbh, we are the ones at the biggest disadvantage.
Smiley Culture Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 I don’t buy the disadvantage line of playing at different stadiums. If we’re using that as a reason for disadvantage then surely some clubs can make a case of being disadvantaged for playing a game when it’s stifilingly hot and others have to in cooler temperatures? Surely Leicester have a case for being disadvantaged for having to play at that midden Newport County call home compared with say, Man City who had Home comforts in the Cup?
Honey Honey Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 10 minutes ago, Smiley Culture said: I don’t buy the disadvantage line of playing at different stadiums. If we’re using that as a reason for disadvantage then surely some clubs can make a case of being disadvantaged for playing a game when it’s stifilingly hot and others have to in cooler temperatures? Surely Leicester have a case for being disadvantaged for having to play at that midden Newport County call home compared with say, Man City who had Home comforts in the Cup? Home advantage is real yes. It's why there isn't a single club who have won more away games in their history than home games. That doesn't happen by coincidence. At least the statistical probability of it happening by coincidence must be unbelievably low.
LFCMike Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Storts said: Couldn't have said this at any time this season though? Not sure it really impacts anyone else tbh, we are the ones at the biggest disadvantage. The situation has become farcical and when it became clear it wasn't going to be resolved earlier Spurs should have been told they had to see the season out at Wembley. I get it's a complete pain in the arse for your fans but that's your clubs problem and it's up to them to compensate your supporters adequately. I just don't see how it's fair for the competition if you're playing 13/14 of them at Wembley and the rest in the new ground.
LFCMike Posted January 9, 2019 Posted January 9, 2019 2 hours ago, Smiley Culture said: I don’t buy the disadvantage line of playing at different stadiums. If we’re using that as a reason for disadvantage then surely some clubs can make a case of being disadvantaged for playing a game when it’s stifilingly hot and others have to in cooler temperatures? Surely Leicester have a case for being disadvantaged for having to play at that midden Newport County call home compared with say, Man City who had Home comforts in the Cup? These are things that are unavoidable and that have happened since league and cup football began. Not comparable to this situation at all
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted January 9, 2019 Subscriber Posted January 9, 2019 1 hour ago, LFCMike said: I just don't see how it's fair for the competition if you're playing 13/14 of them at Wembley and the rest in the new ground. I do see your point, and I can't decide which side of the fence I fall on this one, but I would say that, on a competitive level, it disadvantages Spurs themselves more than anyone else having to change home grounds in the middle of the season.
LFCMike Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 9 hours ago, RandoEFC said: I do see your point, and I can't decide which side of the fence I fall on this one, but I would say that, on a competitive level, it disadvantages Spurs themselves more than anyone else having to change home grounds in the middle of the season. I agree, potentially it does. And whatever way you look at it, other clubs could argue that their rivals in the table have had an advantage that was completely avoidable
Vegan Kel Posted January 10, 2019 Posted January 10, 2019 Can see both sides to this argument but I do feel that if you want to be Champions then you have to face whatever is put in front of you and not worry about what other teams do
Subscriber Dan+ Posted January 10, 2019 Subscriber Posted January 10, 2019 20 hours ago, Smiley Culture said: I don’t buy the disadvantage line of playing at different stadiums. If we’re using that as a reason for disadvantage then surely some clubs can make a case of being disadvantaged for playing a game when it’s stifilingly hot and others have to in cooler temperatures? Surely Leicester have a case for being disadvantaged for having to play at that midden Newport County call home compared with say, Man City who had Home comforts in the Cup? We aren't disadvantaged, we just play like it sometimes
Subscriber CaaC (John)+ Posted January 17, 2019 Subscriber Posted January 17, 2019 Quote Tottenham get Wembley capacity increase from the council 10 minutes ago | Tottenham Tottenham have been given council approval to increase the capacity for home matches played at Wembley Stadium. Brent Council agreed a capped capacity for five domestic fixtures of 62,000, while any additional home Champions League ties could hold the full 90,000. Premier League home games against Watford, Newcastle United and Leicester City will remain capped at 51,000. Spurs announced earlier in January that their new stadium will not be ready until at least March. Club chairman Daniel Levy apologised for the continued delay and said there would be another update towards the end of January. Spurs were originally scheduled to move into their new stadium in September but the project has suffered construction delays. The new ground, which will also host NFL games, has a capacity of 62,062 and is located on the site of their old White Hart Lane home. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46903625
LFCMike Posted February 7, 2019 Posted February 7, 2019 North London derby on 2nd March to be played at Wembley
Subscriber Pyfish+ Posted February 7, 2019 Subscriber Posted February 7, 2019 It would have been a good opening game to play at the new place!
duruy Posted March 8, 2019 Posted March 8, 2019 I have been a fan of Tottenham for a long time and it is surprising that I have never been to Tottenham Hotspur. On March 31, a Liverpool-Tottenham Hotspur game will take place at this stadium. I think Liverpool will win, but of course I wanted it to be the other way around, well, let's see how it will be) Do you bet on? I already looked at the landing plan, and bought tickets for the match. I found more detailed information on worldstadia.com . This guide found by chance and I think what hotel to stay in, they offer some good places. Choosing between London Shelton Hotel - and Beaconsfield Hotel which one is better not tell me?
POiuyt Posted March 8, 2019 Posted March 8, 2019 Just now, duruy said: I have been a fan of Tottenham for a long time and it is surprising that I have never been to Tottenham Hotspur. On March 31, a Liverpool-Tottenham Hotspur game will take place at this stadium. I think Liverpool will win, but of course I wanted it to be the other way around, well, let's see how it will be) Do you bet on? I already looked at the landing plan, and bought tickets for the match. I found more detailed information on worldstadia.com . This guide found by chance and I think what hotel to stay in, they offer some good places. Choosing between London Shelton Hotel - and Beaconsfield Hotel which one is better not tell me? I still think that Liverpool will win, but we'll see. I've been to this stadium more than once, it's cool there. I will not tell you about the account, as I have not stopped in any of them.
The Artful Dodger Posted March 8, 2019 Posted March 8, 2019 Your guide is shite, the match is at Anfield ya robot spoons.
Administrator Stan Posted March 8, 2019 Author Administrator Posted March 8, 2019 Quote Tottenham will play the first competitive fixture at their new stadium in the first week of April. Spurs were scheduled to move to the new White Hart Lane stadium in September but construction has been delayed. Who their first opponents are hinges on Brighton's FA Cup campaign. If Brighton beat Millwall in the FA Cup on 17 March, Crystal Palace will be Spurs' visitors on 3 April, but if the Seagulls are knocked out, they will be the opposition on 6 or 7 April. Tottenham said they have worked with the Premier League, Brighton and Palace to ensure the first competitive fixture at the stadium will be a league encounter. Manager Mauricio Pochettino has said he expects to play their Champions League quarter-final home leg at the venue on 9/10 or 16/17 April, following the draw on 15 March. Prior to getting the green light for competitive matches, Spurs said in a statement that two test events "with increasing levels of attendance" must be staged "in order to achieve a formal safety certificate". An under-18s fixture with Southampton on 24 March will allow for a capacity of around 30,000, before a legends match on 30 March will see around 45,000 fans admitted to the venue. Chairman Daniel Levy has previously apologised to fans for delays to the completion of the stadium, which has a capacity of 62,062 and is located on the site of their old White Hart Lane home. The new stadium - which was expected to cost around £750m - will also stage NFL matches, with Levy stating it would "redefine sports and entertainment experiences". Spurs have played their 2018-19 fixtures at Wembley Stadium, amassing a record of nine wins and a draw from 14 home league matches. If they do get the necessary safety certificate following the test events, they will not play another fixture at Wembley https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47502366
Danny Posted March 9, 2019 Posted March 9, 2019 1 hour ago, 6666 said: Why not just wait until next season..? £££
Danny Posted March 18, 2019 Posted March 18, 2019 The big day approaches! It’ll be good for them to get used to the stadium the end of this season so next season is an easy transition. Bet they’ll miss those 80k/90k attendances though.
True Blue Posted March 20, 2019 Posted March 20, 2019 Jesus this build was a disaster with endless delays. I think even FourSix is fucking excited at this point.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.